<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I See Running In My Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2008/03/09/i-see-running-in-my-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2008/03/09/i-see-running-in-my-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:37:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2008/03/09/i-see-running-in-my-future/comment-page-1/#comment-50710</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2008/03/09/i-see-running-in-my-future/#comment-50710</guid>
		<description>heh, I&#039;m definitely less skilled at running.   Though I ran varsity cross country in high school, I was always a lot more competitive on the bike.

For me, I find it much easier to push myself on the bike.  When running, the only stress placed on my body is on lungs.  I ran cross country in high school too and always looked at practice and racing a breeze compared to my cycling.   Probably because you spend so much more time on the bike.

As for the BB, I agree and was very (and still am) skeptical of it&#039;s claims but it does have some value in that it forces me to literally account for every calorie and it does a good job of detecting my physical activity that aligns with my perceived exertion.  The internal pedometer is pretty accurate (tests of 25 steps in my basement).   I estimate that it&#039;s probably ± 15% for calorie burn and that&#039;s close enough for me.  But again, the real value of the thing is the way it makes me think about food.  I still wouldn&#039;t recommend it at this point until I can gather some more data and see some real results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, I&#8217;m definitely less skilled at running.   Though I ran varsity cross country in high school, I was always a lot more competitive on the bike.</p>
<p>For me, I find it much easier to push myself on the bike.  When running, the only stress placed on my body is on lungs.  I ran cross country in high school too and always looked at practice and racing a breeze compared to my cycling.   Probably because you spend so much more time on the bike.</p>
<p>As for the BB, I agree and was very (and still am) skeptical of it&#8217;s claims but it does have some value in that it forces me to literally account for every calorie and it does a good job of detecting my physical activity that aligns with my perceived exertion.  The internal pedometer is pretty accurate (tests of 25 steps in my basement).   I estimate that it&#8217;s probably ± 15% for calorie burn and that&#8217;s close enough for me.  But again, the real value of the thing is the way it makes me think about food.  I still wouldn&#8217;t recommend it at this point until I can gather some more data and see some real results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2008/03/09/i-see-running-in-my-future/comment-page-1/#comment-50709</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2008/03/09/i-see-running-in-my-future/#comment-50709</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always found running to be more &quot;intense&quot; than cycling.  Back in my cross-country days (high school), when I was doing both, I had always noticed this.  Even when going all out on the bike, there&#039;s something inherently intense about running.

Could be that you&#039;re less skilled at running, so your body is less efficient.  

I don&#039;t know about this bodybugg thing.   Measuring the body&#039;s energy usage is not a trivial thing.  Just look at the setups they use in sports medicine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found running to be more &#8220;intense&#8221; than cycling.  Back in my cross-country days (high school), when I was doing both, I had always noticed this.  Even when going all out on the bike, there&#8217;s something inherently intense about running.</p>
<p>Could be that you&#8217;re less skilled at running, so your body is less efficient.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about this bodybugg thing.   Measuring the body&#8217;s energy usage is not a trivial thing.  Just look at the setups they use in sports medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

