<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not So Fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2005/08/23/not-so-fast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2005/08/23/not-so-fast/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:12:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2005/08/23/not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2005/08/23/not-so-fast/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tom, I didn&#039;t know about cmsmatrix and it looks pretty helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tom, I didn&#8217;t know about cmsmatrix and it looks pretty helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2005/08/23/not-so-fast/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raincitystory.com/wp/2005/08/23/not-so-fast/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been researching CMS for several weeks now, and the vast majority seem to operate this way. As I test a few I see that there are performance issues. If you have to switch, you may want to check out www.cmsmatrix.org. One of the dimensions of their matrix is database engine. May or may not save you some time...but good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been researching CMS for several weeks now, and the vast majority seem to operate this way. As I test a few I see that there are performance issues. If you have to switch, you may want to check out <a href="http://www.cmsmatrix.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.cmsmatrix.org</a>. One of the dimensions of their matrix is database engine. May or may not save you some time&#8230;but good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
